Man found responsible in a three-fatality case becomes the third individual to undergo a rarely used legal procedure revived after 15 year

A man convicted in a case involving three fatalities became the third individual this year to undergo a rarely used state procedure in the U.S., recently reinstated after about 15 years. Stephen Bryant, 44, selected this method instead of other available options after spending 21 years in custody. He was originally found responsible for several deaths during incidents in 2004, and on 14 November the procedure was carried out in South Carolina. Reports noted that he chose not to give a final statement.

According to The Independent, Bryant’s final meal included seafood stir fry and chocolate cake. He had previously been linked to a series of fatal events involving several individuals in 2004 while on probation. Court documents describe how he gained entry to one person’s home and left a written message at the scene. Additional records mention another person who survived an encounter with him. Authorities confirmed the process was officially completed at 6:05 p.m. local time.

Bryant’s background, according to attorney Bo King, included a genetic disorder and a history of family-related hardship. His mother’s alcohol use reportedly caused long-term developmental impacts, contributing to emotional challenges throughout his life. Before 2025, the last time this procedure had been used in the U.S. was in 2010. This year marks a renewed yet rare application of the method.

Bryant is the third individual in 2025 in South Carolina — and nationally — to undergo this process. Earlier in March, Brad Sigmon became the first person in 15 years to choose the method instead of other available options, with observers saying it appeared noticeably quicker than previous approaches. A month later, another individual, Mikal Mahdi, underwent the same process, leading to questions from his attorneys about medical documentation. The South Carolina Department of Corrections firmly rejected claims of any procedural issues.

Related Posts

My Mother-In-Law Took Me On A Cruise To Apologize—Or So I Thought

My MIL and I have had a 10-year-long conflict. Suddenly, she invites me on a cruise, just the two of us. I feared a trap, but my…

She Begged Me To Switch Vacation Days—But I Didn’t Know She’d Already Told My Boss

I booked my vacation 6 months ago. Recently, a teammate asked if I could switch dates because she has kids and really needed those days off. I…

How To Fix A Hole In Clothing Without Sewing

Noticing a hole in your favorite shirt, sweater, or pair of pants is never fun. And with the quality of most clothing these days, little holes seem…

A Simple Message That Brought Us Back to What Matters Most

One afternoon, I received a text from my wife that read, “Pick me up from work now. It’s urgent.” My heart skipped a beat because she never…

Biker Pumped Gas Into Crying Girls Car And She Begged To Stop As Her Boyfriend Will Ki ll Her!

I was filling up my Harley at a gas station off Highway 14 when I heard a girl’s voice behind me — thin, shaky, terrified. “Please, sir……

My Son Cut Ties with His Daughter, so We Took Her In – 16 Years Later, He Asked for a DNA Test and Was Shocked by the Results

When my son, Tom, walked away from his daughter Ava, my husband Gary and I didn’t hesitate to step in. Sixteen years later, his sudden request for…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *